DVD Alex & Emma (Full Screen Edition)
For perhaps the first time in her career, Kate Hudson doesn't just imitate the twinkle of her mother, Goldie Hawn--and proves to be a winning romantic lead in her own right. Hudson plays Emma, a stenographer hired by a desperate writer named Alex (Luke Wilson, The Royal Tenenbaums, Legally Blonde), who has to finish a book in 30 days. Of course, a tentative romance blooms between them; but as Alex begins to interweave elements of his life into the love triangle of his novel--including a suspiciously Emma-esque character named Anna--Emma wonders if the novel's sexy other woman has a real-life counterpart as well. Though Alex & Emma suffers from some bland, formulaic elements, it also features flashes of engaging wit. Hudson dampens her gleam, but because she's not working so hard to be adorable, a relaxed and more unique charm comes forth. --Bret Fetzer |
| Previous Page |
 |
Review(s): DVD Alex & Emma (Full Screen Edition) |  |
| Not the Best, But Certainly Enjoyable |
Alex and Emma seems like it would be a great movie, especially because of the appeal that Kate Hudson brings and the charming goofiness of Luke Wilson. While this movie is enjoyable for fans of the romantic comedy genre, it's lukewarm story won't attract anyone who's not expecting the familiar romantic comedy formula (Boy Gets Girl, Boy Loses Girl...) The movie is about a guy named Alex (Wilson) who is a writer struggling to write his second book in thirty days so he can pay off the Cuban mafia for his gambling debt. When they trash his computer, he hires a stenographer named Emma (Hudson) to help him out. The movie has it's moments (I especially enjoyed the one where she drops part of the novel in a puddle and re-writes it herself), but it just doens't have the appeal, wit, or sincerity of other romantic comedies-- like Sleepless in Seattle, or even One Fine Day for that matter. Hudson is the main draw in this movie, and she certainly delivers. She's cute, funny in a not trying to be funny sort of way, and just a great actress, and I'm sorry that this movie wasn't better suited for her talents. Luke Wilson is particulary adorable, though, and I actually felt like I hadn't seen this side of Wilson before in a movie, which I really enjoyed. I didn't like the fact that this movie went between two stories that were practically the same. Alex's book is acted out throughout the movie, and of course his book is a mirror image of what is going on in his real life, except that it's set on a fake island many many years ago. It was unnecessary to have two like stories-- Rob Reiner should've picked one and went with it. I'm a huge fan of romantic comedies, but this one just didn't strike me like others have. However, if you do like romantic movies, by all means see this one.
|  |
| Engaging Leads, But the Story Is Too Mechanical |
"Alex & Emma" is actually a remake of the 1997 UK-Hungarian film 'The Gambler' starring Michael Gambon and Johdi May. And the original is about the Russian writer Dostoevskey, and what happened to him while writing the novella of that title. You should keep this in mind, because "A & E" suffers from the wrong-headed judgment of modernizing the setting of the original which was deep in the 19th century.The story of this romantic comedy is, simply put, "When Alex meets Emma (or vice virsa)" directed by Rob Reiner, who knows a few things about this genre. Alex (Luke Wilson) is a writer stumbled on the writer's block, and in debt. He must make money in 30 days, and to do so, he hires a stenographer Emma (Kate Hudson), and attempts to finish writing a novel. The novel develops, thanks to the unexpected inspiration from Emma. It is about Adam, a tutor living in the 1920s, who falls in love with a French lady Polina (Sophie Marceau). From then on, we see two stories one after the other, both influencing each other. NOW, the good thing about "A & E" is that Kate Hudson (who plays five roles in this film) is delightful to see. Luke Wilson is also good and likable, and they make a couple of man and woman who must fall in love with each other. And we know it, and welcome it. BUT the problem is, as I said before, the setting. In the original "Gambler", Dostoevskey had to submit his rights for publishing his novels to the greedy publisher, not his life as depicted here. No one believes in the central story of "Alex & Emma" when it talks about the 30 days limit and being killed. Think about it. Some mobsters are after you, and they want the money back. However, they burn (yes, literally burn) your lap-top PC, which only prevents your scheme of returning money. That's a too obvious and tactless device on the filmmaker's side to have Alex hire Emma. And in the original, the stenographer has no other place to go except the writer (it was the 19th century, and women's jobs were quite limited). In "Alex and Emma," though Emma needs money (she comes by bus, see?), and she knows Alex is broke because of gambling, she still decides to work for him as long as 30 days without being even paid in advance! And to make matters worse, what Alex writes is not funny at all, but still we are to believe this "story within story" is to be a hit to pay back all the debt. Sorry, but I can't believe it. "Alex & Emma" is engaging only when it forgets its plot, which is a poor excuse for bringing the leads together. And Luke Wilson and Kate Hudson do their jobs quite nicely. Pity that the characters are empty, and the story unbelievable. "When Harry met Sally ..." are about real people. The same cannot be said about "Alex & Emma."
|  |
| Completely and utterly terrible |
I wanted to like this movie; honestly I did. I ignored the horrible film critic reviews and the lack of hype, sure that somewhere in the premise of this movie there would be a glimmer of interest, spark, or maybe even just a little bit of good acting. So... I took a risk and rented this movie. Bad idea. Bad, bad idea. I don't know which I want back more: my $4 rental fee or my two hours. The only, and I mean only, decent thing about this film is that you get to look at Luke Wilson for an extended period of time. Enjoy it, because if you make it to the end of the film, even his cuteness may not keep you from hating him for subjecting you to his aversive non-acting for so long. Kate Hudson is also cute, in the puppy and kitty sense of the word, but she's also utterly forgettable. One word describes it best: bleh. Don't get me started about the circa-1920 plot-within-a-plot, which is the only thing that could possibly be worse than the present-day part of the movie. Of course, this is a romantic comedy, so somebody has to fall in love, but by the time you reach that obvious conclusion, you simply don't care. Don't worry, the characters don't act like they care either. Few films inspire me to get on the Internet and write a scathing review, but if I can keep just one person from wasting their time and brain cells by watching this insipid flick, it'll be worth it.
|  |
|